I completely agree. But... (Destiny)
I take your point (on a certain level, the counter to every ability is “shoot them” ;p) but I was thinking more specifically about the potential for various abilities to counter each other. My favourite class-based shooters are often built around a kind of rock/paper/scissors dynamic, and I’ve always wished Destiny would lean further in that direction. There are hints of it present, but I’d love to see more. There are abilities currently in the game which should have more direct interplay with each other, but don’t. The Hunter dodge, for example. When you dodge, your hitbox actually stays in place until the animation finishes, and then it snaps over to your new location. But until the end of the animation, your hitbox is just sitting in place where you began your dodge. What this means is that it doesn’t actually “dodge” anything. If a dawnblade’s super attack or ranged melee is homing in on you and you dodge to try to avoid it, the homing attack will just keep moving towards your now stationary hitbox. Even though the dodge does technically break the lock-on homing effect, it’s often pointless because your hitbox isn’t moving, so the homing attack just needs to continue on the path it was already heading to make contact with your hitbox. When this combines with other factors like splash damage, lag compensation, and the general squishiness of D2’s hit detection, it makes it extremely unlikely that your hunter dodge will ever effectively dodge anything. It should be the perfect counter to shoulder charges or homing attacks, but the chances of if actually working to dodge those attacks are extremely rare.
Going back to my warlock vs shoulder charge question, what if warlocks had a rift that slowed enemies who ran into it? Or what if they could do the opposite of that useless Phoenix dive and launch themselves trailer up into the air? Those are just a couple thoughts off the top of my head, but I’m sure you get the point.
So I don't like when people use shoulder charge as an example mainly because it, I think, is one of the few regular abilities that is very high risk for high reward. There is a reason it's a one shot. If there was an easy counter to it then it would never be used. I shouldn't even say "easy" as it should equal the difficulty of getting a shoulder charge off (or slightly less).
I do however understand why people use it as an example. It's an ability that doesn't feel good to die to because it feels unfair. That is mostly because the recipient doesn't understand the risk involved in managing to get the kill.
Should there be a rock paper scissors counter to it? Totally. But I think I already listed a couple. And they added even more this season with stasis. For those that don't know, anything that applies the slow affect to a player cancels should charge. It's incredibly annoying because it's basically an instant death to the shoulder charger due to the fact that there is a significant delay when coming out of a shoulder charge (high risk and all that).
So yeah, I didn't want to derail your argument, I agree with it. It just bothers me when people use shoulder charge as an example :D
Complete thread:
- Mask of Bakris sucks. -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-05, 18:44
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-05, 19:50
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-05, 20:07
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-05, 21:15
- I completely agree. But... - cheapLEY, 2020-12-06, 07:03
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-06, 17:57
- I completely agree. But... - Korny, 2020-12-06, 22:51
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-07, 06:45
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 07:36
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-07, 07:52
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-07, 08:21
- I completely agree. But... - squidnh3, 2020-12-07, 08:59
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-07, 08:21
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-07, 07:52
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-07, 08:16
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 08:23
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-07, 08:39
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 09:08
- I completely agree. But... - EffortlessFury, 2020-12-07, 18:04
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-07, 09:34
- I completely agree. But... - cheapLEY, 2020-12-07, 09:54
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-07, 10:17
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 10:29
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-07, 11:05
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 11:26
- Could you give an example of high-risk in another game? - ZackDark, 2020-12-07, 11:52
- I completely agree. But... -
Claude Errera,
2020-12-07, 12:21
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 12:30
- I completely agree. But... - MacAddictXIV, 2020-12-07, 12:35
- I completely agree. But... - ZackDark, 2020-12-07, 13:04
- I completely agree. But... -
Claude Errera,
2020-12-07, 13:21
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 15:24
- I completely agree. But... -
Claude Errera,
2020-12-07, 16:12
- Oh, but... -
Claude Errera,
2020-12-07, 16:15
- Oh, but... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 16:47
- Oh, but... - CruelLEGACEY, 2020-12-07, 16:56
- Oh, but... - EffortlessFury, 2020-12-07, 18:10
- Oh, but... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 16:47
- Oh, but... -
Claude Errera,
2020-12-07, 16:15
- I completely agree. But... -
Claude Errera,
2020-12-07, 16:12
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 15:24
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 12:30
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 11:26
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-07, 11:05
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 10:29
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 09:08
- I completely agree. But... -
squidnh3,
2020-12-07, 09:06
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-07, 10:34
- I completely agree. But... -
squidnh3,
2020-12-07, 14:17
- I completely agree. But... -
Kermit,
2020-12-08, 07:07
- I completely agree. But... - Speedracer513, 2020-12-08, 07:38
- I completely agree. But... -
Kermit,
2020-12-08, 07:07
- I completely agree. But... - Cody Miller, 2020-12-08, 10:13
- I completely agree. But... -
squidnh3,
2020-12-07, 14:17
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-07, 10:34
- I completely agree. But... -
Claude Errera,
2020-12-07, 11:59
- I completely agree. But... - MacAddictXIV, 2020-12-07, 12:39
- I completely agree. But... -
MacAddictXIV,
2020-12-07, 08:39
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 08:23
- I completely agree. But... -
Cody Miller,
2020-12-08, 10:04
- I completely agree. But... - Korny, 2020-12-08, 10:41
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-07, 07:36
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-05, 21:15
- I completely agree. But... -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-05, 20:07
- Mask of Bakris is for Offense -
INSANEdrive,
2020-12-06, 12:38
- Mask of Bakris is for Offense -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-06, 13:05
- I didn't see this linked for this discussion, so here it is - Malagate, 2020-12-10, 13:23
- Mask of Bakris is for Offense -
cheapLEY,
2020-12-06, 13:05
- I completely agree. But... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2020-12-05, 19:50