Disagree
Now you're just purposely muddling "improbable" with "impossible", which I assume you have been doing for a while in this thread...
I seriously think it is possible to create a game in which the only limitations that need to be imposed are already covered by the game's engine (stuff like being invincible, unlimited ammo, noclip, kill other players, steal loot from other players, etc). As such, there wouldn't be any need for rules or bans.
Of course, there will always be the limitations already imposed by XBL and PSN, such as playing with hacked consoles or insulting everyone and their mothers (most times overlooked, by the way) or selling gamertags (dunno the name on the PSN).
I can't stress that last point enough.
I would seriously like for you to come up with something that you judge necessary to rule out of Destiny, given what we know already.
Complete thread:
- The question still remains -
Schooly D,
2013-02-17, 14:10
- The question still remains -
biggy,
2013-02-17, 14:16
- The question still remains -
Schooly D,
2013-02-17, 14:22
- Oh, you mean a GROUP *NM* - Ragashingo, 2013-02-17, 14:25
- Perhaps . . . a Faction? - Jillybean, 2013-02-17, 14:26
- The question still remains - SquallLeonE, 2013-02-17, 14:43
- "Guild" -
biggy,
2013-02-17, 14:47
- The question still remains - Schooly D, 2013-02-17, 14:50
- The question still remains -
Schooly D,
2013-02-17, 14:22
- Destiny seems like a "play the way you want" type of game. -
Pennybags,
2013-02-17, 14:29
- Nope -
Cody Miller,
2013-02-17, 19:44
- Nope - Leviathan, 2013-02-17, 19:51
- Disagree -
Xenos,
2013-02-17, 19:59
- Disagree -
Cody Miller,
2013-02-17, 20:45
- Disagree -
Leviathan,
2013-02-17, 21:09
- Disagree -
Cody Miller,
2013-02-17, 21:23
- Disagree - ZackDark, 2013-02-17, 21:35
- Disagree - Ragashingo, 2013-02-17, 22:03
- Disagree -
Leviathan,
2013-02-17, 22:42
- Favorite quote on the forum so far! - Mr Daax, 2013-02-17, 22:53
- Disagree -
Cody Miller,
2013-02-17, 22:57
- Disagree -
stabbim,
2013-02-18, 12:54
- Well said. *NM* - Xenos, 2013-02-18, 14:23
- Disagree -
stabbim,
2013-02-18, 12:54
- Disagree -
Jillybean,
2013-02-18, 02:55
- Disagree -
Xenos,
2013-02-18, 09:33
- Disagree -
Leviathan,
2013-02-18, 09:57
- Heh, good one - ZackDark, 2013-02-18, 19:00
- Disagree -
Leviathan,
2013-02-18, 09:57
- Disagree -
Xenos,
2013-02-18, 09:33
- Disagree -
Cody Miller,
2013-02-17, 21:23
- Oh good grief. - narcogen, 2013-02-18, 04:01
- Disagree -
Leviathan,
2013-02-17, 21:09
- Disagree -
Cody Miller,
2013-02-17, 20:45
- Nope -
Cody Miller,
2013-02-17, 19:44
- The question still remains -
tarehart,
2013-02-17, 14:36
- The question still remains -
uberfoop,
2013-02-17, 14:49
- The question still remains -
tarehart,
2013-02-17, 15:12
- The question still remains -
narcogen,
2013-02-19, 05:55
- The question still remains - ZackDark, 2013-02-19, 06:34
- The question still remains -
narcogen,
2013-02-19, 05:55
- The question still remains -
tarehart,
2013-02-17, 15:12
- The question still remains -
uberfoop,
2013-02-17, 14:49
- Pants Guild was in the Vidoc at 1:18 -
SIX min WHISTLE,
2013-02-17, 16:09
- Pants Guild was in the Vidoc at 1:18 -
narcogen,
2013-02-18, 05:54
- Also No Shirt Guild and No Shoes Guild *NM* -
Xenos,
2013-02-18, 09:35
- And their mortal enemies the No Service Guild. -
narcogen,
2013-02-18, 09:57
- Heh. - Ragashingo, 2013-02-18, 13:03
- And their mortal enemies the No Service Guild. - stabbim, 2013-02-18, 13:49
- And their mortal enemies the No Service Guild. - Claude Errera, 2013-02-18, 16:21
- And their mortal enemies the No Service Guild. -
narcogen,
2013-02-18, 09:57
- Also No Shirt Guild and No Shoes Guild *NM* -
Xenos,
2013-02-18, 09:35
- Pants Guild was in the Vidoc at 1:18 -
narcogen,
2013-02-18, 05:54
- The question still remains -
biggy,
2013-02-17, 14:16