Short answer is no, AFAIK (DBO)
Computers can only handle mathematical operations up to a point
I mean, you can certainly visualize larger numbers at will, but the computer won't do anything with it.
There's nothing in particular preventing you from representing huge numbers on a computer. Such representations couldn't be used "natively" in the execution units, but it's not like the human brain has streamlined up-arrow registers and execution pipelines either.
Speed is a potential issue if you're going reeeaaaaallllyyyy big and need an exact answer, but with billions of 64-bit ops per second available, you can get a decent amount of work done in reasonable time.
(and even before that point, there are big limitations in how large one operator is compared to the other).
I'm not quite sure what you're referring to here.
Complete thread:
- Happiest of birthdays to Wu! -
Kermit,
2015-11-21, 11:16
- Happy BDay! - Blackt1g3r, 2015-11-21, 13:19
- Happy birthday! - Leviathan, 2015-11-21, 14:39
- Its Claude's birthday again?! -
CruelLEGACEY,
2015-11-21, 15:59
- Its Claude's birthday again?! - Ragashingo, 2015-11-21, 16:11
- Its Claude's birthday again?! - Cody Miller, 2015-11-21, 17:54
- I know, right? - Beorn, 2015-11-21, 18:25
- Happy birthday! - Pfhrogblast, 2015-11-21, 17:18
- Happy Birthday. - Xenos, 2015-11-21, 17:37
- Another birthday song. - Funkmon, 2015-11-21, 19:07
- Didn't think it was possible.Do numbers really go that high? -
INSANEdrive,
2015-11-21, 22:01
- Only until Bungie nerfs Claude's age. -
narcogen,
2015-11-21, 23:13
- They'd have to bring Zero up to 35 to even it out. - Funkmon, 2015-11-21, 23:20
- Theoretically, yes. -
Quirel,
2015-11-22, 07:04
- Math question -
Funkmon,
2015-11-22, 17:09
- Math question -
Quirel,
2015-11-22, 19:32
- Math question -
Funkmon,
2015-11-22, 19:40
- Short answer is no, AFAIK -
ZackDark,
2015-11-22, 22:12
- Short answer is no, AFAIK -
uberfoop,
2015-11-24, 05:13
- Short answer is no, AFAIK -
ZackDark,
2015-11-24, 20:18
- Short answer is no, AFAIK - uberfoop, 2015-11-24, 21:47
- Short answer is no, AFAIK -
ZackDark,
2015-11-24, 20:18
- Short answer is no, AFAIK -
uberfoop,
2015-11-24, 05:13
- Short answer is no, AFAIK -
ZackDark,
2015-11-22, 22:12
- Math question -
Funkmon,
2015-11-22, 19:40
- Math question -
Cody Miller,
2015-11-22, 19:34
- Math is weird. - Funkmon, 2015-11-22, 19:46
- Math question -
Quirel,
2015-11-22, 19:32
- Math question -
Funkmon,
2015-11-22, 17:09
- Only until Bungie nerfs Claude's age. -
narcogen,
2015-11-21, 23:13
- The grim reaper stares on in disbelief - breitzen, 2015-11-21, 22:46
- Thanks to everyone! -
Claude Errera,
2015-11-22, 00:56
- Hey I didn't old man! - Xenos, 2015-11-22, 02:47
- Happy Birthday, Claude! - Morpheus, 2015-11-22, 02:23
- Happiest of birthdays to Wu! - red robber, 2015-11-22, 02:48
- Happy 50th! - narcogen, 2015-11-22, 23:54
- Happiest of birthdays to Wu! - dogcow, 2015-11-23, 05:22
- Mig's video -
Kermit,
2015-11-23, 14:47
- Well Done Mig. - dogcow, 2015-11-23, 15:09
- my contribution -
Schedonnardus,
2015-11-23, 15:51
- my contribution - Funkmon, 2015-11-23, 16:41
- Holy cow, that was awesome - ZackDark, 2015-11-23, 23:50
- Mig's video -
MartyTheElder,
2015-11-24, 01:28
- +1 - Kermit, 2015-11-24, 09:24
- Mig's video - Claude Errera, 2015-11-24, 13:26
- This is really cool. - INSANEdrive, 2015-11-25, 16:32
- Birthdays; the STD that keeps on giving (Many more, Claude!) - Anton P. Nym (aka Steve), 2015-11-23, 18:30
- Happiest of birthdays to Wu! -
nico,
2015-11-23, 21:21
- Happiest of birthdays to Wu! - Funkmon, 2015-11-23, 22:49
- You're being nice so he doesn't put sugar in your gas tank - Up North 65, 2015-11-23, 22:55
- Remember... - Robot Chickens, 2015-11-24, 20:49