Of course not. (Gaming)
by Cody Miller 
, Music of the Spheres - Never Forgot, Saturday, August 13, 2016, 18:28 (3033 days ago) @ Claude Errera
What's the value in this? Is there value? Can it be a GOOD thing? Is it fair to judge art by what's 'outside' of it? Is there a price to tapping into this? Or do you just look at only what's right in front of you?
This is a pretty standard question, when discussing art - why would videogames be different?
Video games are the most technologically dependent art. Therefore, issues regarding the technology are generally at the forefront. Not many people paid attention to the tech of film stock (after color was introduced of course), but many people are aware of the underlying technical aspects and issues in games.
Case and point: people being impressed with the number of planets in No Man's Sky, the graphics in Doom 3, etc, and having that drive enjoyment.
Complete thread:
- Speaking for itself -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 02:14
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Who is this Leo? -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-13, 03:04
- Bingo. - cheapLEY, 2016-08-13, 03:18
- Of course not. -
Funkmon,
2016-08-13, 04:44
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 11:06
- Of course not. -
Korny,
2016-08-13, 11:25
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 11:27
- Of course not. - Korny, 2016-08-13, 11:55
- Hmm. - slycrel, 2016-08-13, 13:20
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 11:27
- Of course not. -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-13, 13:19
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 13:58
- Of course not. - Ragashingo, 2016-08-13, 15:47
- Of course not. -
Claude Errera,
2016-08-13, 17:54
- Of course not. - Cody Miller, 2016-08-13, 18:28
- Of course not. -
Robot Chickens,
2016-08-13, 20:10
- ^Definitely the best post in this thread^
![[ [ No text ] ]](themes/default/images/no_text.png "Empty posting / no text")
-
stabbim,
2016-08-15, 04:18
- Whoa, whoa, whoa. -
Funkmon,
2016-08-15, 04:26
- +2 -
Robot Chickens,
2016-08-15, 13:59
- +2
- Whoa, whoa, whoa. -
Funkmon,
2016-08-15, 04:26
- ^Definitely the best post in this thread^
- Of course not. - EffortlessFury, 2016-08-13, 22:23
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 13:58
- Of course not. -
Korny,
2016-08-13, 11:25
- Of course not. -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-13, 11:06
- Speaking for itself - Chewbaccawakka, 2016-08-13, 05:45
- Problems with perception -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-08-13, 14:20
- Problems with perception - Cody Miller, 2016-08-13, 14:28
- At the end of the day, who cares? -
cheapLEY,
2016-08-13, 16:11
- +1 -
Korny,
2016-08-13, 17:37
- +1
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
electricpirate,
2016-08-14, 02:11
- I've been waiting for this day...for a looooong time... -
Pyromancy,
2016-08-14, 03:10
- Well played, sir. Well played indeed. :) -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-14, 03:22
- I've been waiting for this day...for a looooong time... - stabbim, 2016-08-15, 04:16
- Well played, sir. Well played indeed. :)
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
stabbim,
2016-08-15, 04:17
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
electricpirate,
2016-08-16, 02:33
- No art speaks entirely for itself - INSANEdrive, 2016-08-17, 03:07
- No art speaks entirely for itself - stabbim, 2016-08-17, 17:33
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
electricpirate,
2016-08-16, 02:33
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-16, 12:46
- No art speaks entirely for itself - Kermit, 2016-08-16, 15:16
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
electricpirate,
2016-08-16, 16:26
- He did say "enjoy" :p -
ZackDark,
2016-08-16, 16:28
- No art speaks entirely for itself -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-16, 23:09
- Wait... -
ZackDark,
2016-08-17, 01:58
- Woah man, thats like so deep, its like a metaphor for people - Pyromancy, 2016-08-17, 02:24
- Wait... -
ZackDark,
2016-08-17, 01:58
- He did say "enjoy" :p
- I've been waiting for this day...for a looooong time... -
Pyromancy,
2016-08-14, 03:10
- Speaking for itself -
Kermit,
2016-08-15, 15:10
- Speaking for itself -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-15, 15:22
- Speaking for itself -
Kermit,
2016-08-15, 15:35
- +1 -
Claude Errera,
2016-08-15, 16:23
- +2. I don't even read the usernames anymore. -
ProbablyLast,
2016-08-15, 16:33
- The opposite is also fun... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-08-15, 21:33
- The opposite is also fun... - Kermit, 2016-08-15, 21:58
- The opposite is also fun... -
CruelLEGACEY,
2016-08-15, 21:33
- Makes me wonder, who does and doesn't have a voice -
kidtsunami,
2016-08-15, 19:41
- Morpheus Caps Every. Single. Word. -
marmot 1333,
2016-08-15, 20:05
- Wow, I've never noticed till now, so consistent. -
kidtsunami,
2016-08-15, 20:26
- Holy crap. -
Funkmon,
2016-08-15, 21:45
- +1 -
ZackDark,
2016-08-15, 22:22
- Holy crap. - CyberKN, 2016-08-15, 22:34
- +1
- Wow, I've never noticed till now, so consistent.
- Morpheus Caps Every. Single. Word. -
marmot 1333,
2016-08-15, 20:05
- +1 -
Cody Miller,
2016-08-15, 21:14
- +1 - Kermit, 2016-08-15, 21:19
- Everyone starts using Gizoogle :P -
CyberKN,
2016-08-15, 21:27
- +2. I don't even read the usernames anymore.
- +1 -
Claude Errera,
2016-08-15, 16:23
- Speaking for itself -
Kermit,
2016-08-15, 15:35
- Of interest - Kermit, 2016-08-15, 17:52
- Speaking for itself -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-15, 15:22
- Speaking for itself - Kahzgul, 2016-08-17, 23:19
- Who is this Leo? -
Ragashingo,
2016-08-13, 03:04